Ice and snow go away, let the sun shine today

Regrettably, ice and snow are a part of wintertime life in Ohio. Those are not my words, but those of our state supreme court. Unfortunately inclement weather, such as that we’ve recently had, leads to a number of mishaps and injuries caused by slipping and falling on snow or ice covered streets, sidewalks, or parking lots. During such times we receive many calls from our prospective clients who have been injured by such a fall. It’s my unpleasant task to inform them that our supreme court has decided that there is no liability on the part of a property owner for injuries resulting from natural accumulations of ice and snow on outdoor parking lots or sidewalks as the property owner is charged with no duty to remove such hazards. This is true even where a local ordinance requires the abutting property owner to clear sidewalks of ice and snow.

As to ice or snow tracked into a place of business, barring some exceptional circumstances, there is also no liability on the part of the business owner or property owner for injures resulting from a fall caused by the tracked in moisture. Regrettably, the law expects pedestrians who traverse areas of accumulated ice or snow to be aware of and to exercise caution when ambulating over the area. Fortunately, the law treats less harshly those whose injuries have been caused by the business owner or whose neglect in cleaning up hazardous accumulations on the floor of their premises has resulted in an injurious fall to their customer.

I’m sure you hope, as do we for warmer days.

Court of appeals orders new trial after woman breaks neck and is awarded only $2,114.11

In March of 2011, Plaintiff Gerri Thomas, a licensed practical nurse, was injured in an automobile collision when a truck driven by Defendant Nicholas Pisoni struck her while she traveled at approximately 40 mph. At the scene of the accident, she was placed in a neck collar and backboard for immobilization and transported to the hospital. Once there, it was discovered that the force of the collision broke the Plaintiff’s neck at the C-6 vertebrae. Plaintiff’s doctors ordered that she wear a hard cervical collar to allow the bones to heal. Unfortunately, Plaintiff experienced increasing pain and was first treated with steroid injections but eventually required surgery. Due to the injury, Plaintiff testified that she lost wages totaling over $9,400.00, out-of-pocket medical expenses of $4,467.00, and incurred medical bills of approximately $37,000.00.

After hearing all of the evidence, a Stark County jury awarded Plaintiff just $2,114.11. Of this amount, $700.00 was for lost wages, $214.11 was reimbursement for her cervical collar, and $1,200.00 was for pain and suffering. Plaintiff requested a new trial arguing that jury’s verdict was inadequate and contrary to both the law and the facts presented at trial. This request was initially denied but was later granted on appeal by the 5th District Court of Appeals.

The Appellate Court found that “[t]he jury’s award did not fully compensate [Plaintiff] and denied her justice.” Thomas v. Pisoni, 2015-Ohio-376, ¶ 35 (5th Dist. Stark). The court went on to state that the “jury’s verdict was inadequate because there was no evidence disputing the severity of the collision; no evidence, expert or otherwise, disputing the collision neither solely caused appellant’s fractured neck and subsequent surgery; nor disputing the collision resulted in limited life functions, pain and discomfort.” Id. The Court concluded that the damages award could not be reconciled with the “uncontroverted evidence” and was “against the manifest weight of the evidence.” Id. at ¶37. Let us hope that Ms. Thomas’ next trial fully and adequately compensates her for the injuries and delivers the justice she was denied at her first trial.

Attorneys Ron Plymale and Shawn Dingus named to Columbus CEO 2015 Top Lawyers

The staff at Plymale Partnership would like to congratulate both Shawn Dingus and Ron Plymale for being named premier attorneys in the Central Ohio region by Columbus CEO magazine. Columbus CEO holds an annual rating feature based on a rating algorithm used by Avvo, one of the top attorney review sites in the nation, to determine its highly exclusive list.

This year’s top lawyers were rated at 8 and above on Avvo’s ten point scale and were subjected to only one or two primary practices for each lawyers based alphabetically. Both Shawn and Ron were selected for their work in representing clients for personal injury cases. Once again congratulations to Mr. Plymale and Mr. Dingus and we look forward to continuing success in 2015!

If You Have Case to Discuss, Contact Our Firm Today to Schedule a Free, Consultation.

Why is my Divorce Case Taking So Long?

Clients often ask me to explain the reason that contested divorce cases and contested custody actions take so long to resolve. While there is a myriad of reasons to explain the protracted duration of divorce and custody cases, the primary culprit is usually the contested nature of the case itself. While an agreement can usually be approved by the court within sixty days, disputed cases take much longer to reach a conclusion. Those reasons include the need to formally serve the other party with a copy of the lawsuit (called a complaint) and a summons, to which the other party has up to twenty-eight (28) days to respond, which can often take more than six weeks to complete.

Steps of a Contested Divorce or Custody

Next, at least one of the parties usually requests the court to issue temporary orders. That process requires an initial hearing, usually scheduled six to eight weeks after the filing of the complaint, at which the parties discuss the possible resolution of all disputed issues. If no agreement is reached, the assigned Magistrate will order the parties and their attorneys to submit sworn affidavits usually within two to three weeks following the hearing. If the case involves children, the court will usually also appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the best interests of the children, and will often delay the submission of affidavits to allow the GAL an opportunity to conduct an investigation. After submission of the affidavits, the court usually issues temporary orders three to four weeks later. By that time, the case is already three months old, and usually older if a GAL is involved.

The parties then often elect to conduct discovery, which can come in the form of written questions to be answered by the other party, a request for the other party to produce documents (e.g. financial documents, photographs, correspondence, etc.), and the deposition of the parties (sworn testimony recorded by a stenographer) . This process can take three to six months to complete, depending on the complexity of the disputed issues. The parties may also need to hire expert witnesses to value assets (e.g. appraisers, accountants, etc.) or to provide expert testimony relating to the children (e.g. physicians, psychologists, etc.)

After all of these tasks are completed, including many others that I do not have the space to include in this article, the attorneys will need to prepare the case for trial, which will initially require scheduling time on the judge’s docket to actually try the case, which in turn will depend on the judge’s availability and the size of his/her docket. At any given time, most judges have hundreds of cases pending before them, many of which will have been pending longer than your case. The number of days scheduled by the court for trial depends on the nature and complexity of each case. The more complex the case, the longer it will take to complete.

Average Time a Custody Case Lasts

On average, a case involving custody will take at least three days to complete, oftentimes requiring seven days or more. To prepare for the trial, which is subject to the same rules as the trials you see on television, the attorneys will need to identify and prepare witnesses, gather and organize physical evidence (e.g. financial documents, photographs) prepare balance sheets of the parties assets and liabilities, prepare child support worksheets, and a host of other tasks that are too numerous to list here. At the end of the presentation of evidence, the judge will usually take the matter under advisement and issue a decision several weeks later.

As you can see, contested actions require a significant investment of time, designed to both protect the parties and to ensure that the court is provided with all relevant evidence to allow it to issue a decision. Of course, should the parties ultimately reach an agreement during the case, no trial is necessary and the case can be scheduled for an uncontested hearing.

If You Have Case to Discuss, Contact Our Firm Today to Schedule a Free, Consultation.